Microsoft vs. Google
Posted on August 21, 2007 by Guy Snir
Filed Under Open Source, Microsoft, Opinion, License, Google |
Ashlee Vance over at The Register wrote an article “Microsoft vs. Google – the open source shame” with a detailed description of the forum wars between Chris DiBona, Google’s Open Source manager, and Bill Hilf, Microsoft’s Open Source chief.
The topic of the debate, of course, is Microsoft’s latest move of submitting two licenses for approval by the OSI.
Ashlee mentions the various issues/problems Google has with Open Source. Although some of the points raised have some validity, I do not see how they relate to the topic or debunk the valid claims Chris DiBona has made.
I find it hard to accept the claim that if Microsoft plays the game by the rules we should not criticize and/or make cynical remarks (which I enjoy…).
The Open Source “trademark” has its share of problems and issues. Add the confusion Microsoft is currently creating and the, highly likely, confusion they will create if one of their licenses is approved, and you have a definite concern and a legitimate debate.
Some more resources on the topic:
- Open Source Hackles Raised over Microsoft’s OSI Submission - Lora Bentley, IT Business Edge
- A discussion regarding Microsoft submiting the MSPL to the OSI
- Microsoft capitulates to the OSI, gets horse-whipped for its troubles - Matt Asay, CNET
- OSI email group gets catty over Microsoft’s Permissive License request - Tina Gasperson, Linux.com
- Google balks at Microsoft’s open source licence - Tom Sander, WhatPC
Update: More Coverage
- OSi, Microsoft, and OSI-Certified Licenses - Walking With Elephants
- Why, Why, Why OSI? - Pamela Jones, Groklaw
Comments
-
Syndicate
-
All blog posts and content on Open Source Guy by Guy Snir are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
The views expressed on this blog are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.